He loves Donald Trump.

Not abstractly. Not reluctantly. He loves him — the conviction, the audacity, the refusal to be cancelled by a media establishment he has never trusted. My father, a Black man from Ghana, sees in Donald Trump a kind of fearless authenticity he rarely encounters in politicians.

I’m bringing this up because I want you to understand where I’m writing from. I am a British-Norwegian-Ghanaian filmmaker and activist. I have lived and worked across Oslo, London, Amsterdam, and Kigali. I speak five languages. I have spent years studying the mechanics of power: how it is wielded, how it is justified, and how it is protected. I do not write from a place of tribal contempt or political illiteracy. I write from a place of genuine intellectual bewilderment that I have been trying to resolve since the contradiction first walked through my front door.

Subscribe now

In January 2021, three weeks after the United States Capitol was stormed by a mob waving Confederate flags and MAGA merchandise, I was a 22-year-old marketing student in my first year at Queen Mary University of London. I submitted an essay dissecting the psychological and sociological mechanics of MAGA as a political campaign. I received 85%. My highest undergraduate grade.

My professor didn’t know he was marking a prophecy.

What follows is that analysis, updated, sharpened, and re-aimed at 2026.

The Question Nobody Is Asking Loudly Enough

MAGA implies the United States once was great. That single implied premise contains the entire argument.

Great for whom?

The United States rose to global prominence on the back of what sociologist Gurminder Bhambra calls a “slave-society.” Whatever “greatness” America achieved in its ascent was inseparable from the systematic exploitation of Black people: first through chattel slavery, then through legalised segregation, and now through structural inequality so thoroughly embedded in law, housing, policing, and education that it no longer requires overt enforcement to sustain itself.

MAGA, therefore, is not a political slogan. It is an act of selective amnesia. A nostalgia for a hierarchy. And the fact that it needed to be a slogan at all, that the longing for that hierarchy had to be mobilised, organised, and sold to millions of people, tells you everything about who felt threatened and why.

But here is where the story gets more specific, and where most political commentators have repeatedly and catastrophically gotten it wrong.

The Working Class Was Never the Story

The dominant narrative after 2016 was seductive in its simplicity: the working class, economically abandoned by globalisation and coastal elites, struck back. The “left behind” thesis. The same story was applied to Brexit — ordinary people, forgotten by Westminster, voting to take back control.

It was compelling. It was also fiction.

Empirical research, specifically Bhambra’s rigorous analysis of voting patterns, directly implicates the white middle class as the primary driver of both Trump’s 2016 victory and the Brexit result. Not the working class. The middle class. People with economic stability. People with assets. People who, by any conventional measure, had not been left behind.

This distinction is not semantic. It is the entire argument.

Because if it were the working class voting against economic abandonment, that would be rational self-interest. Comprehensible. Even admirable in its desperation.

But if it was the middle class, people who have, then the engine is not economics. It is something else entirely. And that something else is considerably more disturbing.

The Psychology of Losing What You Never Deserved

Robert Cialdini’s work on persuasion identifies scarcity as one of the most powerful levers in human decision-making. People who have tasted a better life react more violently to the threat of losing it than those who have never known it. The working class, many of whom have lived in material deprivation for generations, have in many ways normalised their circumstances. They feel the weight of structural inequality daily, but they have not built a fragile identity around what they might lose.

The middle class has. And when that middle class is predominantly white, and the “better life” they’ve tasted rests, consciously or not, on structural racial advantage, the perceived threat of losing that advantage activates something primal and predictable.

Political scientist Diana Mutz calls this status threat. It operates on two simultaneous fronts. First: racial status threat, white Americans confronting the statistical reality that they will soon be a demographic minority, and the corresponding fear of losing social and political dominance. Second: global status threat, America’s declining unilateral authority on the world stage, sharpened by the rise of China.

These two anxieties converge in a specific demographic: predominantly white, Christian, male Americans for whom “being American” is not simply citizenship. It is identity. When that identity is threatened simultaneously from within and without, the response is not rational policy preference.

Panic personified. And panic is open to exploitation.

MAGA was the exploitation.

Privilege Loss, Dressed as Grievance

Here is what Bhambra establishes with uncomfortable precision: what Trump voters experienced as status threat amounts, in practice, to a relative loss of privilege. Not poverty. Not abandonment. The slow, inevitable erosion of an unjust advantage, one that was never earned, that derived directly from the America that was “great,” ergo the America of enforced racial hierarchy.

MAGA did not promise jobs. It promised the restoration of a hierarchy.

And scarcity, Cialdini knew, obstructs our ability to think clearly. Which is why economic statistics, immigration data, and trade balance figures are entirely irrelevant to a voter operating under perceived status threat. The psychology overwhelms the arithmetic. Every time. Predictably. By design.

2026: The Prophecy Confirmed

This analysis was written in January 2021. Since then:

Donald Trump survived two impeachments, multiple criminal indictments, a conviction on 34 counts, and an assassination attempt. He won the 2024 presidential election. He is currently serving his second term.

Project 2025, a 900-page governing blueprint assembled by the Heritage Foundation, is being implemented. Its architects are explicit: reverse the demographic and cultural shifts that constitute the “threat” this essay describes. Restructure federal institutions to concentrate power in the executive. Dismantle the bureaucratic machinery that constrains it.

January 6th 2021 was not an anomaly. It was the logical endpoint of a movement built on status threat, scarcity psychology, and the systematic conflation of whiteness with American identity, playing out, inevitably, on the steps of the building that houses the people’s government.

Nothing in this analysis has aged. Everything has been confirmed.

The playbook works. That is the most important thing to understand. Not that Trump is uniquely skilled or uniquely dangerous, though both may be true, but that the mechanism he deployed is replicable. And it is being replicated. Right now. On this side of the Atlantic.

Make Britain Great Again: The Franchise Expands

Nigel Farage’s Reform UK is not a coincidence. It is a franchise deployment of the identical psychological playbook, localised for British consumption. Same demographic. The same fear of demographic change, dressed in concern about sovereignty and immigration. The same conflation of national identity with white Christian identity. The same deliberate erasure of class solidarity across racial lines.

The UK riots of summer 2024, far-right mobs attacking mosques, hotels housing asylum seekers, Black and brown communities in English towns that had been multiracial for decades, were not spontaneous. They were the predictable output of a machine running the same programme. MAGA provided the algorithm. Reform UK is the British deployment.

And Grenfell Tower burned in 2017. Seventy-two people died. The majority were people of colour. The cladding that killed them was chosen because it was cheaper: £2 per square metre saved by switching to non-fire-retardant panels. The building control department that might have caught it had been defunded. The post-colonial British government, which has benefited enormously from the labour, culture, and tax contributions of people of colour, treated their lives as an acceptable line item to cut.

Grenfell is not a tragedy. A tragedy implies randomness. Grenfell is a policy outcome. The same class-and-race logic that drives MAGA in America drove the decision to clad a residential tower block in West London with flammable material and leave seventy-two people inside when it caught fire.

Reform UK is MAGA for people who say “mate” instead of “buddy.”

The branding differs. The machinery is identical. And the UK immigration debate, currently at fever pitch, instrumentalised relentlessly by Farage and his allies, is running the same scarcity programme on British soil. Your jobs. Your housing. Your country. The foreigner as the supposed threat. The hierarchy as the solution.

This is not politics. This is a product. And people are buying it.

The Foreign Threat Release Valve

There is one more mechanism worth naming.

When the status-threatened demographic, white, 50-plus, middle class, Christian, feels the walls closing in domestically, there is a reliable release valve: foreign threat. The spectre of Iran, China, radical Islamism, or whatever the current designated villain happens to be serves a precise psychological function. It activates a saviour complex. It reframes racial anxiety as national security. It gives the voter a target for their fear that is foreign, distant, and conveniently brown.

War, or the theatre of war, is a subsidy to the MAGA coalition. It reassures. It unifies. It redirects attention from the domestic hierarchy to an external enemy. Every time a foreign policy crisis erupts during a period of domestic cultural anxiety, ask yourself: who benefits from the distraction? Whose fears are being soothed? Whose identity is being restored?

Recognising fear as a product, manufactured, packaged, and sold to a specific demographic for political gain, changes how you read every news cycle from an administration built on status threat.

To the Young White Men Reading This

I want to speak to you directly.

There is a well-funded, algorithmically optimised media machine, Ben Shapiro, Reform UK, a thousand YouTube channels and Substack newsletters, telling you that you are the real victims. That feminism took your purpose. That immigration took your opportunity. That “wokeness” took your identity.

I am not here to dismiss your confusion. Identity crises are real. Cultural transitions are painful. And I would be lying if I said the progressive conversation about race and gender has always been conducted with the nuance that complex subjects demand.

But I need you to sit with this: an identity built exclusively on being a white male is inherently unstable. Not because whiteness is a moral failing or masculinity is the problem, but because any identity that depends on maintaining a hierarchy can only survive as long as the hierarchy holds. The moment it shifts, demographically, culturally, economically, you experience it as an assault on your selfhood. Not because it is. But because you were never given the tools to locate yourself outside of it.

Your fathers, and their fathers, anchored their identity in a dominance that was structurally enforced and culturally normalised. You are inheriting the anxiety of watching that dominance erode. You did not choose this. But you are being offered a choice about what to do with it.

MAGA offers you the restoration of the hierarchy. Erika Kirk, now CEO of Turning Point USA, recently stood in front of a room of students and told them not to let anyone disenfranchise them — “especially a young, white, male man.” The clip went viral within hours. Farage will tell you it’s about sovereignty. What they are all selling is the same scarcity campaign with updated packaging: your identity is under threat, and the solution is to keep the hierarchy intact.

The actual working class, all of it, including the Black and brown workers who have been systematically edited out of that category whenever it becomes politically convenient, is the demographic that has genuinely been left behind. And the movement that claims to fight for them keeps electing representatives whose policies make their lives structurally worse, while directing your attention toward a trans athlete, an asylum seeker in a hotel, or a statue.

Don’t follow the playbook. Learn to read it. That’s the only invitation this piece is extending.

Verdict

MAGA was never about the working class. It was a precision-engineered scarcity campaign, targeted at the racial and economic anxieties of a middle class unwilling to relinquish the privileges of a hierarchy they did not build but have always benefited from. It told them their loss of dominance was injustice. It told them the clock could be wound back. It told them greatness was behind them, not ahead, and that the right man, given enough power, could return them to it.

They believed it. Because they were afraid. And fear, as Cialdini established and Trump’s strategists understood with clinical precision, makes people predictable.

The prophecy is confirmed. The playbook is documented. The franchise is expanding — through Reform UK in Britain, through authoritarian nationalist movements across Europe, through every political actor who has correctly identified that manufacturing status threat is cheaper, faster, and more electorally reliable than building actual policy.

The question for 2026 is not whether this works. It demonstrably does. The question is whether those of us who can see the mechanism are willing to name it loudly enough, consistently enough, and early enough, before the next iteration hardens into something the next generation inherits as normal.

I wrote this analysis at 22, three weeks after the Capitol was stormed, and received the highest grade of my undergraduate degree for it. I’m writing it again at 27. The argument is the same. The stakes are sharper.

Paradoxically, my own father is an avid Trump supporter. And yet here I am. You do not have to feed the playbook just because it has been placed in your hands — not even when it comes from home.

Am I Really Free? — a documentary about institutional power, about what happens when the people at the bottom of the hierarchy attempt to use a system that was never designed to serve them — releases on 16 October 2026.

The question in the title is the same question underneath every argument in this piece.

Joshua Arthur is a British-Norwegian-Ghanaian filmmaker, activist, and entrepreneur. First Class Honours, BSc Marketing & Management, Queen Mary University of London, 2022. Nike Black Community Commitment Board Member. Currently based between Oslo and London.

More at jjdreamss.com

Typing this whilst I have two followers is not the issue. Them being my mother’s two email addresses is not the point either. Attempting to gain sympathy is not the task at hand. So swiftly, let us segue onto the next paradox. I know of something much worse and I will get there; watch me put it in sport.

Not even trying to force the issue, however, consider right now. This present moment in our globalised melting pot of a society. How does one even accomplish such a feat? Having nothing; no blueprint, no acquaintances, no nothing on that profile of yours. In this day and age, that is absurd. Let us be real. Surely, likely, hopefully one friend or ten of them could do you a solid; spare a follow or two. Would be nice, no? To not have to start from scratch. Completely.

One has to have absolutely no sense of self when swimming through this specific ocean. A new platform; abandoned and alone. You are quite literally diving headfirst into a pool of sharks and orcas. The tiger shark with its infamous fins, coupled with the black and white whale that kills to earn a name. Lethal combination, by the way. Do you not correlate social media, the world wide web, and our small digital footprints to a season finale of The Walking Dead? Walking bait. No armour. Minecraft at spawn. Getting bitten by a zombie before you even know they eat flesh. Stooping in like a headless chicken does nobody any favours; least of all yourself.

So. What could be worse, you might ask?

Trust me; I am talking to myself right now. And to you. Do not keep fish on the very same hook you caught them on. They should go in the boat. So let us build the boat first. Social proof helps, yes. But having nothing tangible will be your detriment before you even get off the floor. A clean website in your bio is the starting point. Link every platform; all of them. Good at video? Do some writing too. Give them options. Versatility. Everybody is so afraid of a large digital footprint. I say create it deliberately.

Give them something to look at. If not a logo, then your face.

Subscribe now

The audience will come and go. Algorithms shift. Platforms die. The infrastructure you build; the domains, the systems, the ecosystems; that outlasts all of it. I spent a week this month setting up email aliases, DNS records, gallery pages, and a six-domain ecosystem before publishing a single word here. Most creators post first and build later. I have watched that approach fail at scale; including my own. So this time, I built the boat before I needed the sea.

— Joshua Arthur (@JJDREAMSS) is a digital ecosystem architect and founder of Kings Collective, operating across Amsterdam, London and Oslo.

There’s a peculiar silence before something matters. The calm before the storm. When we ready ourselves for what is yet to come, a very certain calibre of excellence is requ…

Read more